Partner Visa Sponsorship Limit Waiver: Successful Case Study
Life and love rarely follow a straight line. Relationships begin and end, and sometimes, tragic circumstances change the course of our lives forever. When it comes to Australian immigration law, these complex personal histories can create significant hurdles, especially for partner visas.
One of the most rigid rules is the limitation on how many times a person can sponsor a partner. What happens when you’ve found love again, but your past sponsorship history stands in the way?
Today, I want to share a real-life story of a client who faced this exact challenge. His journey demonstrates that even with what seems like an insurmountable barrier, having already sponsored two partners, there can be a path forward. This case study explores the successful application of a “Partner Visa Sponsorship Limit Waiver” based on compelling and compassionate circumstances.
Disclaimer:The information in this article is for general guidance only and is not intended as legal advice. Immigration laws and policies change regularly, and your individual circumstances can significantly impact visa eligibility and outcomes. If you are considering applying for a visa or are unsure about your situation, it’s best to seek advice from an Australian legal practitioner.
Flow Migration Law provides tailored legal advice for partner visa applicants. Book a consultation if you’d like personalised support.
The Background: A Story of Love, Loss, and a New Beginning
Our client, an Australian citizen, was in a committed and exclusive relationship with his partner from the Philippines. His greatest wish was to build a life with her in Australia. However, his migration history presented a major complication.
He had sponsored two partners in the past:
His first partner, also from the Philippines, was granted a Prospective Marriage visa. Unfortunately, after the visa was granted, their relationship came to an end before they could marry.
His second partner, from the Philippines as well, initially came to Australia on a visitor visa. Their relationship flourished, and he sponsored her for an onshore partner visa (subclass 820), which was granted. They built a life together and had a child. Tragically, his partner was diagnosed with cancer and passed away in 2019, leaving him a widower and a single father.
Even after his wife’s passing, our client remained close to her family and friends. It was through this network that he reconnected with a friend of a friend of his late wife. A genuine connection sparked, their relationship grew, and they decided they wanted to spend their lives together in Australia.
This led to the critical question: After sponsoring twice, could he legally sponsor a third partner?
(For our client, this question wasn’t just a legal query; it was about the possibility of a new beginning with the person he loved.)
Unpacking the Legal Hurdle: Understanding Regulation 1.20J
The answer to our client’s question lies in a specific part of the Migration Regulations known as Regulation 1.20J. This regulation exists to prevent the misuse of the partner visa program.
In simple terms, Regulation 1.20J sets out these key limitations:
Two Sponsorship Limit: A person can sponsor a maximum of two partners in their lifetime (Reg. 1.20J(1)(a)).
Five-Year Gap: A person who has previously sponsored a partner cannot sponsor another partner until at least five years have passed since the first visa application was lodged (Reg. 1.20J(1)(b)).
Sponsored Person Limitation: A person who was granted a partner visa themselves cannot sponsor a new partner until at least five years have passed since their own visa application was made (Reg. 1.20J(1)(c)).
Our client’s situation fell directly under the first point. He had already used his two lifetime sponsorships. On the face of it, the law said he could not sponsor his new partner.
(The client’s history ran into the firm letter of the law, specifically the sponsorship limitations outlined in Regulation 1.20J.)
The Path to a Solution: The “Compelling Circumstances” Waiver
Fortunately, the law recognises that life is not always black and white. Regulation 1.20J(2) provides a pathway for the Department of Home Affairs to waive these limitations if there are ‘compelling circumstances’ affecting the sponsor.
So, what does the Department consider ‘compelling’? Policy guidelines provide some examples, which include:
The applicant and sponsor have a dependent child together.
The death of the previous partner.
The previous partner abandoned the sponsor, leaving them with dependent children to care for.
The new relationship is longstanding.
These are just examples, not an exhaustive list. When assessing a waiver request, the Department considers the sponsor’s entire situation and the hardship they would face if they were unable to sponsor their new partner and felt compelled to leave Australia to be with them.
In our client’s case, we identified two powerful arguments for a waiver:
The Death of His Partner: His second wife, whom he had sponsored, had tragically passed away. This is one of the specific examples listed in policy as a compelling circumstance. He was not a serial sponsor ending relationships; he was a widower.
Care and Support for His Dependent Child: The client and his late wife had a child together. This child, who was diagnosed with autism, was solely dependent on our client for all care and support. The need to maintain a stable and supportive home environment for his child in Australia was a significant factor.
It was clear that his situation was not one of abuse of the migration program but a series of deeply unfortunate life events. We prepared a detailed legal submission that clearly articulated these compelling circumstances, supported by extensive evidence.
The result was a success. The Department accepted our arguments, exercised their discretion to waive the sponsorship limitation, and the partner visa application was ultimately approved.
(A successful outcome: The relief and joy of a partner visa approval, allowing a couple to finally begin their life together in Australia.)
Key Lessons from This Sponsorship Limitation Waiver Journey
Life is Unpredictable, and Migration Law Can Account for It: While the rules may seem rigid, provisions like the ‘compelling circumstances’ waiver exist because the law acknowledges that tragic and unforeseen situations occur. Your story matters.
Discretionary Waivers Require a Carefully Prepared Case: A waiver is not automatic. The decision-maker has the discretion to approve or refuse it. Simply stating that a previous partner passed away is not enough. You must build a persuasive argument, supported by evidence, that addresses the legal criteria and tells your story in a compelling way.
Full Disclosure is Non-Negotiable: When dealing with a complex history, it is vital to be upfront and honest about your past sponsorships. A well-prepared application addresses these issues head-on and explains the circumstances, rather than hoping they go unnoticed.
This case is a powerful reminder that even in the most complex migration matters, a way forward can often be found with the right approach.
Your relationship history should not be an automatic barrier to your future happiness. If your story involves complex sponsorship matters, navigating the path requires careful handling and a deep understanding of the law.
Our principal lawyer, Jay Son, brings over 8 years of dedicated experience in Australian immigration law to every case. He has assisted many clients in situations similar to this, presenting their circumstances to the Department to achieve positive outcomes.
(A carefully prepared case makes all the difference. Our team is ready to help you navigate your complex migration journey.)
FAQ: Partner Visa Sponsorship Limits & Waivers
❓I’ve sponsored someone before more than five years ago. Does the two-sponsorship limit still apply to me? Yes. The five-year gap and the two-sponsorship limit are separate rules. Even if more than five years have passed since your last sponsorship, you are still generally limited to sponsoring a maximum of two partners in your lifetime unless a waiver is granted.
❓What kind of evidence is needed to prove ‘compelling circumstances’? This depends entirely on your specific situation. For a case like ours, evidence might include the former partner’s death certificate, the child’s birth certificate, medical reports for the child (e.g., confirming an autism diagnosis), and statements outlining the sponsor’s role as the sole carer and the potential hardship of being separated from their new partner.
❓My previous relationship ended badly, and my ex-partner left me. Is that a compelling circumstance? It can be, but it’s more complex. If your former partner abandoned you and you have dependent children from that relationship requiring your care, it is a strong factor. A simple or messy breakup, on its own, is generally not considered a compelling circumstance for a waiver.
❓Is getting a sponsorship waiver guaranteed if my previous partner passed away? No outcome is ever guaranteed. The death of a previous partner is a very strong reason, listed in policy, but the final decision is always discretionary. The decision-maker assesses all aspects of your case, including the nature of your new relationship and your overall circumstances.
❓Why can’t I just write a letter myself explaining my situation to the Department? You certainly can, but a legal submission does much more than just explain. It frames your personal story within the specific context of Australian migration law and policy. It references the relevant regulations (like 1.20J), cites departmental policy guidelines, and structures the evidence in a way that directly addresses the legal test for “compelling circumstances.” This presents your case in the most effective way for a decision-maker to assess.
Jay Son is the Founder of Flow Migration Law and an Australian Immigration Lawyer with over 8 years of experience helping couples and families navigate the Australian partner visa and all family immigration processes. He works closely with each client to simplify the legal complexities and provide clear and strategic guidance tailored to their unique journey.
Jay is also a strong Migration Advocate and is highly experienced in challenging government decisions in relation to Australian immigration law, solving difficult migration matters and visa problems including the ART appeals, visa refusals, visa cancellations, Schedule 3 submissions, health waivers and character concerns.